[dpdk-dev,1/2] test: store only the test case name

Message ID 1489930654-16827-2-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
State New
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers show

Checks

Context Check Description
checkpatch success coding style OK
Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Jerin Jacob March 19, 2017, 1:37 p.m.
Store only the test case name in unit test case structure.The actor who
renders the test status can add appropriate test status. This enables
adding the new test case status without storing the additional
information in the unit test case structure.

Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
---
 test/test/test.c | 14 ++++++--------
 test/test/test.h | 23 +++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Comments

Harry van Haaren March 20, 2017, 9:58 a.m.
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 1:38 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Jerin
> Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test: store only the test case name
> 
> Store only the test case name in unit test case structure.The actor who
> renders the test status can add appropriate test status. This enables
> adding the new test case status without storing the additional
> information in the unit test case structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>  test/test/test.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  test/test/test.h | 23 +++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/test/test.c b/test/test/test.c


It looks like the patch got corrupted somehow - the above line should be  app/test/test.c, not test/test/test.c
Applying fails here, but with a s/test/app in the right places, the patches (this and next) both apply cleanly, and work well.
This handles the event/sw timeout_ticks() unsupported function as should so,

Tested-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>


With the above apply issue resolved, also

Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Jerin Jacob March 20, 2017, 10:04 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:58:04AM +0000, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 1:38 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Jerin
> > Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test: store only the test case name
> > 
> > Store only the test case name in unit test case structure.The actor who
> > renders the test status can add appropriate test status. This enables
> > adding the new test case status without storing the additional
> > information in the unit test case structure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> >  test/test/test.c | 14 ++++++--------
> >  test/test/test.h | 23 +++++++++--------------
> >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/test/test.c b/test/test/test.c
> 
> 
> It looks like the patch got corrupted somehow - the above line should be  app/test/test.c, not test/test/test.c
> Applying fails here, but with a s/test/app in the right places, the patches (this and next) both apply cleanly, and work well.
> This handles the event/sw timeout_ticks() unsupported function as should so,
> 
> Tested-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> 
> 
> With the above apply issue resolved, also

Recently there was a rework in test directory. Now test/test points to old app/test
in dpdk-master.So no issues.

http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/test/test

> 
> Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Harry van Haaren March 20, 2017, 10:14 a.m.
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com]


> > It looks like the patch got corrupted somehow - the above line should be
> app/test/test.c, not test/test/test.c
> > Applying fails here, but with a s/test/app in the right places, the patches (this and
> next) both apply cleanly, and work well.
> > This handles the event/sw timeout_ticks() unsupported function as should so,
> >
> > Tested-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> >
> >
> > With the above apply issue resolved, also
> 
> Recently there was a rework in test directory. Now test/test points to old app/test
> in dpdk-master.So no issues.
> 
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/test/test


Ah, I'm behind on master - apologies, should have done a git pull.

In that case, just

Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>


Thanks for taking the lead on this patchset!

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/test/test/test.c b/test/test/test.c
index cd0e784..a86dc86 100644
--- a/test/test/test.c
+++ b/test/test/test.c
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@  unit_test_suite_runner(struct unit_test_suite *suite)
 {
 	int test_success;
 	unsigned total = 0, executed = 0, skipped = 0, succeeded = 0, failed = 0;
+	const char *status;
 
 	if (suite->suite_name) {
 		printf(" + ------------------------------------------------------- +\n");
@@ -201,15 +202,12 @@  unit_test_suite_runner(struct unit_test_suite *suite)
 			suite->unit_test_cases[total].teardown();
 
 		if (test_success == TEST_SUCCESS)
-			printf(" + TestCase [%2d] : %s\n", total,
-					suite->unit_test_cases[total].success_msg ?
-					suite->unit_test_cases[total].success_msg :
-					"passed");
+			status = "succeeded";
 		else
-			printf(" + TestCase [%2d] : %s\n", total,
-					suite->unit_test_cases[total].fail_msg ?
-					suite->unit_test_cases[total].fail_msg :
-					"failed");
+			status = "failed";
+
+		printf(" + TestCase [%2d] : %s %s\n", total,
+				suite->unit_test_cases[total].name, status);
 
 		total++;
 	}
diff --git a/test/test/test.h b/test/test/test.h
index 82831f4..9a979d3 100644
--- a/test/test/test.h
+++ b/test/test/test.h
@@ -185,29 +185,24 @@  struct unit_test_case {
 	int (*setup)(void);
 	void (*teardown)(void);
 	int (*testcase)(void);
-	const char *success_msg;
-	const char *fail_msg;
+	const char *name;
 	unsigned enabled;
 };
 
-#define TEST_CASE(fn) { NULL, NULL, fn, #fn " succeeded", #fn " failed", 1 }
+#define TEST_CASE(fn) { NULL, NULL, fn, #fn, 1 }
 
-#define TEST_CASE_NAMED(name, fn) { NULL, NULL, fn, name " succeeded", \
-		name " failed", 1 }
+#define TEST_CASE_NAMED(name, fn) { NULL, NULL, fn, name, 1 }
 
-#define TEST_CASE_ST(setup, teardown, testcase)         \
-		{ setup, teardown, testcase, #testcase " succeeded",    \
-		#testcase " failed ", 1 }
+#define TEST_CASE_ST(setup, teardown, testcase) \
+		{ setup, teardown, testcase, #testcase, 1 }
 
 
-#define TEST_CASE_DISABLED(fn) { NULL, NULL, fn, #fn " succeeded", \
-	#fn " failed", 0 }
+#define TEST_CASE_DISABLED(fn) { NULL, NULL, fn, #fn, 0 }
 
-#define TEST_CASE_ST_DISABLED(setup, teardown, testcase)         \
-		{ setup, teardown, testcase, #testcase " succeeded",    \
-		#testcase " failed ", 0 }
+#define TEST_CASE_ST_DISABLED(setup, teardown, testcase) \
+		{ setup, teardown, testcase, #testcase, 0 }
 
-#define TEST_CASES_END() { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0 }
+#define TEST_CASES_END() { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0 }
 
 #if RTE_LOG_LEVEL >= RTE_LOG_DEBUG
 #define TEST_HEXDUMP(file, title, buf, len) rte_hexdump(file, title, buf, len)