[dpdk-dev,v3] rte_vhost: added user callbacks for socket open/close
Checks
Commit Message
Added new callbacks to notify about socket connection status.
As destroy_device is used for virtqueue processing *pause* as well as
connection close, the user has no distinction between those.
Consider the following scenario:
rte_vhost: received SET_VRING_BASE message,
calling destroy_device() as usual
user: end-user asks to remove the device (together with socket file),
OK, device is not *in use* - that's NOT the behavior we want
calling rte_vhost_driver_unregister() etc.
Instead of changing new_device/destroy_device callbacks and breaking
the ABI, a set of new functions new_connection/destroy_connection
has been added.
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
---
v3: improved err-handling path and updated commit msg
v2: also updated vhost_lib.rst
lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h | 5 ++++-
lib/librte_vhost/socket.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:50:58PM +0200, Dariusz Stojaczyk wrote:
> Added new callbacks to notify about socket connection status.
> As destroy_device is used for virtqueue processing *pause* as well as
> connection close, the user has no distinction between those.
>
> Consider the following scenario:
> rte_vhost: received SET_VRING_BASE message,
> calling destroy_device() as usual
>
> user: end-user asks to remove the device (together with socket file),
> OK, device is not *in use* - that's NOT the behavior we want
> calling rte_vhost_driver_unregister() etc.
>
> Instead of changing new_device/destroy_device callbacks and breaking
> the ABI, a set of new functions new_connection/destroy_connection
> has been added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
> ---
> v3: improved err-handling path and updated commit msg
> v2: also updated vhost_lib.rst
The doc update is missing. I have cherry-picked it from v2.
Applied to dpdk-next-virtio.
Thanks.
--yliu
@@ -107,7 +107,10 @@ struct vhost_device_ops {
*/
int (*features_changed)(int vid, uint64_t features);
- void *reserved[4]; /**< Reserved for future extension */
+ int (*new_connection)(int vid);
+ void (*destroy_connection)(int vid);
+
+ void *reserved[2]; /**< Reserved for future extension */
};
/**
@@ -217,9 +217,7 @@ vhost_user_add_connection(int fd, struct vhost_user_socket *vsocket)
vid = vhost_new_device();
if (vid == -1) {
- close(fd);
- free(conn);
- return;
+ goto err;
}
size = strnlen(vsocket->path, PATH_MAX);
@@ -230,24 +228,40 @@ vhost_user_add_connection(int fd, struct vhost_user_socket *vsocket)
RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "new device, handle is %d\n", vid);
+ if (vsocket->notify_ops->new_connection) {
+ ret = vsocket->notify_ops->new_connection(vid);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
+ "failed to add vhost user connection with fd %d\n",
+ fd);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+
conn->connfd = fd;
conn->vsocket = vsocket;
conn->vid = vid;
ret = fdset_add(&vhost_user.fdset, fd, vhost_user_read_cb,
NULL, conn);
if (ret < 0) {
- conn->connfd = -1;
- free(conn);
- close(fd);
RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
"failed to add fd %d into vhost server fdset\n",
fd);
- return;
+
+ if (vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection)
+ vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection(conn->vid);
+
+ goto err;
}
pthread_mutex_lock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vsocket->conn_list, conn, next);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
+ return;
+
+err:
+ free(conn);
+ close(fd);
}
/* call back when there is new vhost-user connection from client */
@@ -277,6 +291,9 @@ vhost_user_read_cb(int connfd, void *dat, int *remove)
*remove = 1;
vhost_destroy_device(conn->vid);
+ if (vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection)
+ vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection(conn->vid);
+
pthread_mutex_lock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
TAILQ_REMOVE(&vsocket->conn_list, conn, next);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);