[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options

Sujith Sankar (ssujith) ssujith at cisco.com
Thu Sep 19 06:37:20 CEST 2013


Thanks Keith !  Your inputs are really helpful.
I'll keep the contacts handy.

Regards,
-Sujith

On 18/09/13 4:45 AM, "Wiles, Roger Keith" <keith.wiles at windriver.com>
wrote:

>Hi Sujith,
>
>Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network
>acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to
>DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system
>meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does).
>
>Wind River's INP product is a complete TCP/IP stack with many more
>features and protocols backed by the largest embedded development company
>in the world. We also have a very close relationship with Intel (as we
>are wholly owned subsidiary of Intel)
>
>We have a patent pending socket layer acceleration design and many more
>features.
>
>Please contact 
>steve.konish at windriver.com<mailto:steve.konish at windriver.com> or
>Paul.Senyshyn at windriver.com<mailto:Paul.Senyshyn at windriver.com> for more
>details.Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the
>CTO office, Wind River
>direct 972.434.4136  mobile 940.213.5533  fax 000.000.0000
>[Powering 30 Years of
>Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
>
>On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
><ssujith at cisco.com<mailto:ssujith at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Vincent,
>
>Sincere thanks to you for the email !  This is very helpful.
>I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
>about the other options later.
>
>Regards,
>-Sujith
>
>On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN"
><vincent.jardin at 6wind.com<mailto:vincent.jardin at 6wind.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
>may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
>robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
>applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
>for the DPDK too:
> - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
> - maybe LwIP TBC
> - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
>and to list them on dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org>.
>
>My 2 cents,
> Vincent
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>
>In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
>little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
>Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
>DPDK libraries and applications?  Quick googling gave a few names
>(6Wind,
>rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc).  But some wise words from the group
>could
>go a long way in helping me out.
>
>Thanks in advance !
>-Sujith
>
>
>
>



More information about the dev mailing list