[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2 v4] Fix two compile issues with i686 platform
Thomas Monjalon
thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Fri Dec 12 16:09:46 CET 2014
2014-12-12 06:38, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:21:44PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2014-12-11 15:28, Qiu, Michael:
> > > On 2014/12/11 21:26, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 01:56:06AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > >>> These two issues are both introuduced by commit b77b5639:
> > > >>> mem: add huge page sizes for IBM Power
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Michael Qiu (2):
> > > >>> Fix compile issue with hugepage_sz in 32-bit system
> > > >>> Fix compile issue of eal with icc compile
> > > >> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> Applied
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >>
> > > > Wait, why did you apply this patch? We had outstanding debate on it, and
> > > > Michael indicated he was testing a new version of the patch.
> > >
> > > Yes, I test the solution you suggest :) and it mostly works, but with a
> > > little issue.
> > > I have re-post not the old version.
> >
> > Neil, v4 is a new version implementing what you suggested.
> > There was no comment and it looks good so I applied it.
> >
> > > Do you take a look at?
> >
> I didn't. Apologies, I see the v4 now. That said, something is off. If you
> look at the list archives, I see patch 0/2 v4 in the list, but not 1/2 or 2/2,
> theres no actual patch that got posted. Was it sent to you privately?
No there are public and you are Cc.
> > I think Neil missed the v4. Sorry to not have pinged you, I wanted rc4 for
> > validation at this time.
> > Neil do you agree this version is OK or do you see some issue to fix?
> >
> Again, I think Michales send went sideways. 0/4 went to the list but the actual
> patches only went to you Thomas. Please post them to the list
They were correctly posted:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/9282/focus=9754
--
Thomas
More information about the dev
mailing list