[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Move EAL common functions

Ravi Kerur rkerur at gmail.com
Fri Dec 26 16:28:54 CET 2014


On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:22:53AM -0800, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > Inline <rk>
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > > > Move common functions in eal_memory.c to librte_eal/common
> > > > directory.
> > > > Use RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP to differentiate minor differences in
> > > > common functions.
> > > > Fix checkpatch warnings and errors.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kerur <rkerur at gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c    | 36
> > > ++------------------------
> > > >  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c | 43
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h       | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c  | 36
> > > ++------------------------
> > > >  4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > > > index 65ee87d..b192705 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > > > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> > > >       return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static int
> > > > +int
> > > >  rte_eal_contigmem_init(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >       struct rte_mem_config *mcfg;
> > > > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ rte_eal_contigmem_init(void)
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static int
> > > > +int
> > > >  rte_eal_contigmem_attach(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >       const struct hugepage_info *hpi;
> > > > @@ -190,35 +190,3 @@ error:
> > > >       return -1;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > -static int
> > > > -rte_eal_memdevice_init(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > -     struct rte_config *config;
> > > > -
> > > > -     if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY)
> > > > -             return 0;
> > > > -
> > > > -     config = rte_eal_get_configuration();
> > > > -     config->mem_config->nchannel = internal_config.force_nchannel;
> > > > -     config->mem_config->nrank = internal_config.force_nrank;
> > > > -
> > > > -     return 0;
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -/* init memory subsystem */
> > > > -int
> > > > -rte_eal_memory_init(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > -     RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Setting up physically contiguous
> memory...\n");
> > > > -     const int retval = rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ?
> > > > -                     rte_eal_contigmem_init() :
> > > > -                     rte_eal_contigmem_attach();
> > > > -     if (retval < 0)
> > > > -             return -1;
> > > > -
> > > > -     if (internal_config.no_shconf == 0 && rte_eal_memdevice_init()
> < 0)
> > > > -             return -1;
> > > > -
> > > > -     return 0;
> > > > -}
> > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > > index 77830f8..da7aa98 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> > > >  #include <rte_log.h>
> > > >
> > > >  #include "eal_private.h"
> > > > +#include "eal_internal_cfg.h"
> > > >
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * Return a pointer to a read-only table of struct rte_physmem_desc
> > > > @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ rte_eal_get_physmem_size(void)
> > > >       /* get pointer to global configuration */
> > > >       mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
> > > >
> > > > -     for (i=0; i<RTE_MAX_MEMSEG; i++) {
> > > > +     for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_MEMSEG; i++) {
> > > >               if (mcfg->memseg[i].addr == NULL)
> > > >                       break;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ rte_dump_physmem_layout(FILE *f)
> > > >       /* get pointer to global configuration */
> > > >       mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
> > > >
> > > > -     for (i=0; i<RTE_MAX_MEMSEG; i++) {
> > > > +     for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_MEMSEG; i++) {
> > > >               if (mcfg->memseg[i].addr == NULL)
> > > >                       break;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -119,3 +120,41 @@ unsigned rte_memory_get_nrank(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >       return rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config->nrank;
> > > >  }
> > > > +
> > > > +static int
> > > > +rte_eal_memdevice_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct rte_config *config;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY)
> > > > +             return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +     config = rte_eal_get_configuration();
> > > > +     config->mem_config->nchannel = internal_config.force_nchannel;
> > > > +     config->mem_config->nrank = internal_config.force_nrank;
> > > > +
> > > > +     return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/* init memory subsystem */
> > > > +int
> > > > +rte_eal_memory_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Setting up physically contiguous
> memory...\n");
> > > > +     const int retval = rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ?
> > > > +#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP
> > > > +                     rte_eal_contigmem_init() :
> > > > +                     rte_eal_contigmem_attach();
> > > > +#else /* RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP */
> > > > +                     rte_eal_hugepage_init() :
> > > > +                     rte_eal_hugepage_attach();
> > > > +#endif /* RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP */
> > > Given that the functions you are calling here are only ever build for
> the
> > > platform they are called from, it seems to me that you can give them a
> > > shared
> > > name, and just build the appropriate one.  I.e. you don't need to add
> > > ifdeffery
> > > here.
> > >
> > >
> > <rk> Agreed and will be done. Only reason I left it as is because I
> thought
> > it might create confusion since in the code/document in BSD it's referred
> > as contigmem rather than hugepage.
> >
> I agree, it might be a bit confusing, but I think documenting it would be
> superior to creating separate function names with additional ifdeffery.
> cscope
> illustrates pretty well multiple function definitions.
>
> Neil
>
>
<rk> WIll take care of using common function names.


More information about the dev mailing list