[dpdk-dev] [v2 22/23] Packet Framework IPv4 pipeline sample app

[Olivier MATZ]

Hi Christian,

> We need a message type defined for message passing between cores, and
> pktmbuf is definitely not the right approach.

Could you please explain why a pktmbuf is not the right approach?

As proposed in http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002759.html
I think the control mbuf could be replaced by a packet mbuf or an
application private structure.


Regards,
Olivier