[dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all?

[Richardson, Bruce]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all?
> 
> Why does rte_snprintf exist? It seems like a misunderstanding or broken
> implementation of snprintf in some other C library. For standard Glibc,
> I get same result from rte_snprintf and snprintf for all inputs including
> boundary cases

It can indeed probably be deprecated in next release. Any objections?

/Bruce