[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages
Neil Horman
nhorman at tuxdriver.com
Thu May 1 15:14:10 CEST 2014
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK
> for RPM-based distributions.
>
> The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions.
> But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions
> having different API/ABI for different applications:
> - dpdk-core has full version in its name to manage API breaking
> - extensions have a number as name suffix to manage PMD API breaking.
> When API/ABI will be stable, package names could be simpler.
>
> I suggest to add these .spec files as a starting point for integration
> in Linux distributions.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - name of .spec file match package name
> - version in package name
> - no static library
> - ldconfig/depmod in scriplets
>
> Thanks for your comments/reviews.
> --
> Thomas
>
I understand that this is holding up the 1.6.0r2 release, as well as the 1.7.0
integration. As such, given that my concerns, while valid IMO, aren't required
for the release:
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
More information about the dev
mailing list