[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [PMD] [VHOST] Revert unnecessary definition and fix wrong referring in user space vhost zero copy patches

[Ouyang, Changchun]

Hi Thomas,

Fine, I will do it.

One more question:

You have comments as follow:
The title was "[PATCH 0/3] [PMD] [VHOST] *** Support zero copy RX/TX in user space vhost ***"
It should be "[PATCH v2 0/3] Support zero copy RX/TX in user space vhost"

So "[PMD] [VHOST]" in the title should be removed in the cover letter, right?
And in each separate patch letter, it could use "ixgbe:"  or "examples/vhost:", instead of "[PMD] [VHOST]"             
Is it right?


Thanks 
Changchun


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:00 AM
To: Ouyang, Changchun
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [PMD] [VHOST] Revert unnecessary definition and fix wrong referring in user space vhost zero copy patches

Hi Changchun,

2014-05-19 23:09, Ouyang Changchun:
> 1. Revert the change of metadata macro definition for referring to 
> headroom space in mbuf; 2. Fix wrongly referring to RX queues number 
> in TX queues start/stop function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ouyang Changchun <changchun.ouyang at intel.com>

You are fixing commits which are not yet applied.
Please merge and re-send the whole serie by suffixing with "v2".

The title was "[PATCH 0/3] [PMD] [VHOST] *** Support zero copy RX/TX in user space vhost ***"
It should be "[PATCH v2 0/3] Support zero copy RX/TX in user space vhost"

Other notes:
- please split API and ixgbe changes
- set a significant title to each patch
- use prefixes like "ethdev:", "ixgbe:" or "examples/vhost:"

In general, this page is a good help:
	http://dpdk.org/dev#send

Thanks
--
Thomas