[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor

[Richardson, Bruce]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:14 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor
> 
> Ah, my bad, I was looking at the API as a way of multiplexing locally generated
> data to multiple workers for transmission over multiple > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:02:15AM +0000, Richardson, Bruce wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:39 AM
> > > To: Richardson, Bruce
> > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New library: rte_distributor
> > >
> > > >
> > > This sounds an awful lot like the team and bonding drivers.  Why implement
> this
> > > as a separate application accessible api, rather than a stacked PMD?  If you
> do
> > > the latter then existing applications could concievably change their
> > > configurations to use this technology and gain the benefit of load
> distribution
> > > without having to alter the application to use a new api.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure I see the similarity with the bonded driver, which merges multiple
> ports into a single logical port, i.e. you pull packets from a single source which is
> actually pull packets from possibly multiple sources behind the scenes, whereas
> this takes packets from an unknown source and distributes them among a set of
> workers a single packet at a time. (While handling single packets is slower than
> handling packet bursts, it is something that is sometimes needed to support
> existing code which may not be written to work with packet bursts.)
> >network interfaces, not
> to demultiplex received data to multiple workers.  That makes more sense.
> Sorry
> for the noise.  I've got a few more comments inline with the rest of your
> patches.
> Neil

No problem, thanks for the feedback, I'll work through it and submit a v2 patch as soon as I can.

/Bruce