[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [PMD] [VHOST] Revert unnecessary definition and fix wrong referring in user space vhost zero copy patches

[Thomas Monjalon]

Hi Changchun,

Please, it is preferred to answer below the question.

2014-05-20 01:14, Ouyang, Changchun:
> So "[PMD] [VHOST]" in the title should be removed in the cover letter,
> right? And in each separate patch letter, it could use "ixgbe:"  or
> "examples/vhost:", instead of "[PMD] [VHOST]" Is it right?

Yes, you did right in the v2.

Thanks
-- 
Thomas


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:00 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [PMD] [VHOST] Revert unnecessary definition
> and fix wrong referring in user space vhost zero copy patches
> 
> Hi Changchun,
> 
> 2014-05-19 23:09, Ouyang Changchun:
> > 1. Revert the change of metadata macro definition for referring to
> > headroom space in mbuf; 2. Fix wrongly referring to RX queues number
> > in TX queues start/stop function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ouyang Changchun <changchun.ouyang at intel.com>
> 
> You are fixing commits which are not yet applied.
> Please merge and re-send the whole serie by suffixing with "v2".
> 
> The title was "[PATCH 0/3] [PMD] [VHOST] *** Support zero copy RX/TX in user
> space vhost ***" It should be "[PATCH v2 0/3] Support zero copy RX/TX in
> user space vhost"
> 
> Other notes:
> - please split API and ixgbe changes
> - set a significant title to each patch
> - use prefixes like "ethdev:", "ixgbe:" or "examples/vhost:"
> 
> In general, this page is a good help:
> 	http://dpdk.org/dev#send
> 
> Thanks
> --
> Thomas