[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] Add in_flight_bitmask so as to use full 32 bits of tag.

jigsaw jigsaw at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 10:24:19 CET 2014


OK thanks. Sorry my bad. -ql

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
> wrote:

> 2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw:
> > >>Do you have another commit before this one in your tree?
> >
> > Yes this patch relies on this one:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html
> >
> > Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under
> same
> > cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch.
> > Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf
> in
> > the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed.
>
> OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by
> line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3
> patch in
> the original thread.
>
> No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Thomas
>


More information about the dev mailing list