[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] testpmd:rework csum forward engine
Olivier MATZ
olivier.matz at 6wind.com
Thu Nov 27 11:23:36 CET 2014
Hi Jijiang,
On 11/27/2014 09:18 AM, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> The changes include:
> 1. use the new introduced ol_flags and fields in csumonly.c file;
> 2. fix an issue of outer UDP checksum check;
> 3. fix an issue that is if the TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_CKSUM is not set, and the "ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4" should be done in the process_inner_cksums();
>
> Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu at intel.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> index d8c080a..0727510 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> @@ -189,11 +189,12 @@ process_inner_cksums(void *l3_hdr, uint16_t ethertype, uint16_t l3_len,
> } else {
> if (testpmd_ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_CKSUM)
> ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
> - else
> + else {
> ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum =
> rte_ipv4_cksum(ipv4_hdr);
> + ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4;
> + }
> }
> - ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4;
Same remark than in the cover letter. I think we currently don't agree
on the meaning of PKT_TX_IPV4 and PKT_TX_IPV6.
> udp_hdr = (struct udp_hdr *)((char *)outer_l3_hdr + outer_l3_len);
> /* do not recalculate udp cksum if it was 0 */
> if (udp_hdr->dgram_cksum != 0) {
> udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = 0;
> - if ((testpmd_ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_CKSUM) == 0) {
> - if (outer_ethertype == _htons(ETHER_TYPE_IPv4))
> - udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
> - rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(ipv4_hdr, udp_hdr);
> - else
> - udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
> - rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(ipv6_hdr, udp_hdr);
> - }
> + if (outer_ethertype == _htons(ETHER_TYPE_IPv4))
> + udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
> + rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(ipv4_hdr, udp_hdr);
> + else
> + udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
> + rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(ipv6_hdr, udp_hdr);
So, I understand that today no dpdk driver support the offload of
outer udp checksum, and that it has to be done in software?
> @@ -383,10 +385,6 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> if (((m->ol_flags & PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR) ||
> (m->ol_flags & PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV6_HDR)))
> tunnel = 1;
> - /* else check udp destination port, 4789 is the default
> - * vxlan port (rfc7348) */
> - else if (udp_hdr->dst_port == _htons(4789))
> - tunnel = 1;
>
> if (tunnel == 1) {
> outer_ethertype = ethertype;
> @@ -394,6 +392,11 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> outer_l3_len = l3_len;
> outer_l3_hdr = l3_hdr;
>
> + /* check udp destination port, 4789 is the default
> + * vxlan port (rfc7348) */
> + if (udp_hdr->dst_port == _htons(4789))
> + l4_tun_len = ETHER_VXLAN_HLEN;
> +
Why moving this? It won't work anymore with drivers != i40e.
> eth_hdr = (struct ether_hdr *)((char *)udp_hdr +
> sizeof(struct udp_hdr) +
> sizeof(struct vxlan_hdr));
> @@ -432,10 +435,11 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
>
> if (tunnel == 1) {
> if (testpmd_ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_CKSUM) {
> - m->l2_len = outer_l2_len;
> - m->l3_len = outer_l3_len;
> - m->inner_l2_len = l2_len;
> - m->inner_l3_len = l3_len;
> + m->outer_l2_len = outer_l2_len;
> + m->outer_l3_len = outer_l3_len;
> + m->l2_len = l2_len;
> + m->l3_len = l3_len;
> + m->l4_tun_len = l4_tun_len;
> }
> else {
> /* if we don't do vxlan cksum in hw,
> @@ -470,7 +474,7 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> { PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_L4_MASK },
> { PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_L4_MASK },
> { PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_L4_MASK },
> - { PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM, PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM },
> + { PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT, PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT },
> { PKT_TX_TCP_SEG, PKT_TX_TCP_SEG },
> };
> unsigned j;
> @@ -498,8 +502,9 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
> m->l2_len, m->l3_len, m->l4_len);
> if ((tunnel == 1) &&
> (testpmd_ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_CKSUM))
> - printf("tx: m->inner_l2_len=%d m->inner_l3_len=%d\n",
> - m->inner_l2_len, m->inner_l3_len);
> + printf("tx: m->outer_l2_len=%d m->outer_l3_len=%d\n"
> + "m->l4_tun_len=%d", m->outer_l2_len,
> + m->outer_l3_len, m->l4_tun_len);
> if (tso_segsz != 0)
> printf("tx: m->tso_segsz=%d\n", m->tso_segsz);
> printf("tx: flags=");
>
One more comment:
I think the help of csum forward engine in testpmd command lines +
all the comments in csumonly.c should be checked. For example, I
can see: " The VxLAN flag concerns the outer IP and UDP layer (if
packet is recognized as a vxlan packet)". If it concerns the IP header
only, the comment should be modified.
Regards,
Olivier
More information about the dev
mailing list