[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

Vladislav Zolotarov vladz at cloudius-systems.com
Thu Apr 23 13:01:56 CEST 2015


On Apr 23, 2015 12:20 PM, "Ananyev, Konstantin" <
konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Argh, yep my bad -  somehow missed that ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h was modified.
> Yep, I suppose it has to be fixed asap.
> Vlad, can you provide a patch and move it into struct ixgbe_adapter, as
was suggested?

I suddenly recalled that i had promised u something in regard to
recv_scattered()... ;)

I'll prepare a cleanup series that fixes both this "issue" and kills the
ixgbe_scattered_xxx() replacing them with _lro() callbacks.

> Thanks
> Konstantin
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Helin
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:28 AM
> > To: Vlad Zolotarov; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> >
> > Vlad
> >
> > OK. Thanks! We will try to see if a follow up patch set can be
submitted soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Helin
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz at cloudius-systems.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:19 PM
> > > To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 04/22/15 08:28, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> > > > Vlad, how about the new elements added? E.g. rx_vec_allowed was
added in
> > > struct ixgbe_hw in ixgbe_type.h.
> > >
> > > If memory (and sight) serves me well this wasn't in this series... I
suggest we
> > > move to the relevant thread ("bug fixes in the ixgbe PF PMD Rx flow").
> > > In any case, both this and that series were already committed: this to
> > > 2.1 tree and the one with the issue u r referring - to 2.0. U are
welcome to post
> > > a follow up series.
> > >
> > > Moving them say to ixgbe_adapter would address the issue I guess. It
would be
> > > nice if u could CC me when u send the series.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > vlad
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Helin
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz at cloudius-systems.com]
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:59 PM
> > > >> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> > > >> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe
PMD
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 04/22/15 04:23, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Vlad
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have a concern about the code changes you added in ixgbe_type.h.
> > > >> Helin, v9 of this series has addressed exactly this "issue" all new
> > > >> macros have been moved to ixgbe_ethdev.h.
> > > >>
> > > >>> For ixgbe, all source files in librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe, except
> > > >>> ixgbe_osdep.h
> > > >> were called as "base driver", which was not developed by DPDK
> > > >> developers, and released by the other team. We never modify any
code
> > > >> in those base driver source files, and just copy those file into
DPDK project.
> > > >>> We did everything in DPDK developed source files. As we depends on
> > > >>> that
> > > >> team to update future base driver for us, and we don't want to
> > > >> maintain any code changes in "base driver". So we need to think to
> > > >> move your code changes in ixgbe_type.h to other DPDK developed
source
> > > files.
> > > >>> Though your code changes is good enough, but we may need to comply
> > > >>> with
> > > >> what we did before. This will save our maintaining efforts in the
> > > >> future. Also we have similar rules for e1000, i40e, fm10k. Thank
you very
> > > much!
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Helin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad
Zolotarov
> > > >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:52 AM
> > > >>>> To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > >>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the
> > > >>>> ethdev and adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD.
There
> > > >>>> is a big hope that this initiative is going to be picked up by
some
> > > >>>> Intel developer that would add the LRO support to other Intel
PMDs.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The series starts with some cleanup work in the code the final
> > > >>>> patch (the actual adding of the LRO support) is going to
> > > touch/use/change.
> > > >>>> There are still quite a few issues in the ixgbe PMD code left but
> > > >>>> they have to be a matter of a different series and I've left a
few "TODO"
> > > >>>> remarks in the code.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The LRO ("RSC" in Intel's context) PMD completion handling code
> > > >>>> follows the same design as the corresponding Linux and FreeBSD
> > > >>>> implementation: pass the aggregation's cluster HEAD buffer to the
> > > >>>> NEXTP entry of the software ring till EOP is met.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> HW configuration follows the corresponding specs: this feature is
> > > >>>> supported only by x540 and
> > > >>>> 82599 PF devices.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The feature has been tested with seastar TCP stack with the
> > > >>>> following configuration on Tx side:
> > > >>>>      - MTU: 400B
> > > >>>>      - 100 concurrent TCP connections.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The results were:
> > > >>>>      - Without LRO: total throughput: 0.12Gbps, coefficient of
variance:
> > > >> 1.41%
> > > >>>>      - With LRO:    total throughput: 8.21Gbps, coefficient of
> > > variance:
> > > >> 0.59%
> > > >>>> This is an almost factor 80 improvement.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v8:
> > > >>>>      - Fixed the structs naming: igb_xxx -> ixgbe_xxx (some
> > > >>>> leftovers in
> > > >> PATCH2).
> > > >>>>      - Took the RSC configuration code from ixgbe_dev_rx_init()
> > > >>>> into a
> > > >> separate
> > > >>>>        function - ixgbe_set_rsc().
> > > >>>>      - Added some missing macros for HW configuration.
> > > >>>>      - Styling adjustments:
> > > >>>>         - Functions names.
> > > >>>>         - Functions descriptions.
> > > >>>>      - Reworked the ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster() code to make it more
> > > >> readable.
> > > >>>>      - Kill the HEADER_SPLIT flow in ixgbe_set_rsc() since it's
not
> > > >>>> supported
> > > >> by
> > > >>>>        ixgbe PMD.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v7:
> > > >>>>      - Free not-yet-completed RSC aggregations in
rte_eth_dev_stop()
> > > flow.
> > > >>>>      - Fixed rx_bulk_alloc_allowed and rx_vec_allowed
initialization:
> > > >>>>         - Don't set them to FALSE in rte_eth_dev_stop() flow -
the
> > > following
> > > >>>>           rte_eth_dev_start() will need them.
> > > >>>>         - Reset them to TRUE in rte_eth_dev_configure() and not
in
> > > >>>> a
> > > >>>> probe() flow.
> > > >>>>           This will ensure the proper behaviour if port is
re-configured.
> > > >>>>      - Reset the sw_ring[].mbuf entry in a bulk allocation case.
> > > >>>>        This is needed for ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs().
> > > >>>>      - _recv_pkts_lro(): added the missing memory barrier before
> > > >>>> RDT update in a
> > > >>>>        non-bulk allocation case.
> > > >>>>      - Don't allow RSC when device is configured in an SR-IOV
mode.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v6:
> > > >>>>      - Fix of the typo in the "bug fixes" series that broke the
> > > >>>> compilation caused a
> > > >>>>        minor change in this follow-up series.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v5:
> > > >>>>      - Split the series into "bug fixes" and "all the rest" so
that
> > > >>>> the former could be
> > > >>>>        integrated into a 2.0 release.
> > > >>>>      - Put the RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT definition at the
> > > >>>> beginning of rte_ethdev.h.
> > > >>>>      - Removed the "TODO: Remove me" comment near
> > > >>>> RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v4:
> > > >>>>      - Remove CONFIG_RTE_ETHDEV_LRO_SUPPORT from
> > > >>>> config/common_linuxapp.
> > > >>>>      - Define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT in rte_ethdev.h.
> > > >>>>      - As a result of "ixgbe: check rxd number to avoid mbuf
leak"
> > > >>>> (352078e8e) Vector Rx
> > > >>>>        had to get the same treatment as Rx Bulk Alloc (see PATCH4
> > > >>>> for more details).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v3:
> > > >>>>      - ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(): Always reset refcnt of the buffers
to 1.
> > > >>>> Otherwise
> > > >>>> rte_pktmbuf_free()
> > > >>>>        won't free them.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> New in v2:
> > > >>>>      - Removed rte_eth_dev_data.lro_bulk_alloc and added
> > > >>>> ixgbe_hw.rx_bulk_alloc_allowed
> > > >>>>        instead.
> > > >>>>      - Unified the rx_pkt_bulk callback setting (a separate new
patch).
> > > >>>>      - Fixed a few styling and spelling issues.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Vlad Zolotarov (3):
> > > >>>>     ixgbe: Cleanups
> > > >>>>     ixgbe: Code refactoring
> > > >>>>     ixgbe: Add LRO support
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h           |   9 +-
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h                 |   3 +
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h |   6 +
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c     |  11 +
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h     |   5 +
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c       | 766
> > > >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h       |   6 +
> > > >>>>    7 files changed, 737 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> 2.1.0
>


More information about the dev mailing list