[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

Thomas Monjalon thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Mon Apr 27 19:38:27 CEST 2015


2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss:
> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM
> >> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect
> >> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also
> >> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on
> >> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements
> >> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the
> >> last patches easier.
> >
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> 
> When does this series get merged?

It was acked on April 22  and your question was 2 days later on April 24.
Does it mean you are expecting it to be merged the day it is acked?
Or do you fear the merging because of a local dev you are working on?
Anyway, everybody seems happy with this version so it's going to be merged.


More information about the dev mailing list