[dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example

Thomas Monjalon thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Mon Aug 3 18:54:49 CEST 2015


Any news?
Can we remove it from version 2.1?

2015-07-22 14:51, Zhang, Helin:
> Marvin/Waterman
> 
> Could you help to check if l3fwd is good enough for all cases (1g/10/40g, PF and VF, single queue/multiple queue)?
> We aim to remove l3fwd-vf to reduce an example application which is not so necessary.
> Thank you!
> 
> Regards,
> Helin
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:30 AM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example
> > 
> > 2015-07-14 14:50, Zhang, Helin:
> > > From: Wu, Jingjing
> > > > Because VF multi-queues can be supported, l3fwd can run on vf.
> > > > Suggest to remove the l3fwd-vf example.
> > > Totally agree with this!
> > > But we need the confirmation from validation guys of that l3fwd works
> > > quite well on VF with all NICs (e.g. i350, 82599, x550, xl710, and fm10k).
> > 
> > Helin, any new from validation?




More information about the dev mailing list