[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] Change rte_eal_vdev_init to update port_id

[Ravi Kerur]

Hi Tetsuya,

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa at igel.co.jp> wrote:

> On 2015/08/07 3:04, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
> > index 8280cea..472ef5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
> > @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> >  #include <stdio.h>
> >  #include <stdint.h>
> >
> > -#include <rte_dev.h>
> >  #include <rte_pci.h>
> > +#include <rte_dev.h>
> >  #include <rte_ethdev.h>
> >  #include <rte_string_fns.h>
>
> Hi Ravi,
>
> Do we need this fixing?
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
> b/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
> > index 743feef..6e3e304 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c
> > @@ -1582,6 +1582,7 @@ rte_pmd_mpipe_devinit(const char *ifname,
> >       if (!eth_dev) {
> >               RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "%s: Failed to allocate device.\n",
> ifname);
> >               rte_free(priv);
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
>
> How about separating this fixing from the patch, and put it as an one of
> cleanup patch series?
>
>
rte_pmd_mpipe_devinit is the init func pointer called via
rte_eal_vdev_init. Since we were fixing rte_eal_vdev_init thought of taking
care of mpipe issue. If you think it's unrelated to this patch I will send
a separate one.

>       }
> >
> >       RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "%s: Initialized mpipe device"
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > index 4089d66..82d5693 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> >
> >       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "no driver found for %s\n", name);
> > @@ -94,6 +99,7 @@ rte_eal_dev_init(void)
> >  {
> >       struct rte_devargs *devargs;
> >       struct rte_driver *driver;
> > +     uint8_t port_id;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * Note that the dev_driver_list is populated here
> > @@ -108,7 +114,7 @@ rte_eal_dev_init(void)
> >                       continue;
> >
> >               if (rte_eal_vdev_init(devargs->virtual.drv_name,
> > -                                     devargs->args)) {
> > +                                     devargs->args, &port_id)) {
>
> After this line, 'port_id' is actually not used by anywhere in this
> function.
> Also, I guess we will not use port_id in this function in the future.
> How about fixing rte_eal_vdev_init() to handle NULL value correctly to
> remove port_id from this function?
> But I agree your current implementation is also one of choice.
>
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > index 5fe1906..355d709 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > +int
> > +rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_addr(const struct rte_pci_addr *addr, uint8_t
> *port_id)
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +     struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = NULL;
> > +
> > +     if (addr == NULL || port_id == NULL) {
> > +             PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Null pointer is specified\n");
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     *port_id = RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) {
> > +
> > +             pci_dev = rte_eth_devices[i].pci_dev;
> > +
> > +             if (pci_dev != NULL &&
> > +                     pci_dev->addr.domain == addr->domain &&
> > +                     pci_dev->addr.bus == addr->bus &&
> > +                     pci_dev->addr.devid == addr->devid &&
> > +                     pci_dev->addr.function == addr->function) {
>
> You can use rte_eal_compare_pci_addr() here.
>

Will fix this.

>
> > +
> > +                     *port_id = i;
> > +                     return 0;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +     return -ENODEV;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> > index 8345a6c..3d5cb23 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> > @@ -125,5 +125,7 @@ DPDK_2.1 {
> >       rte_eth_timesync_enable;
> >       rte_eth_timesync_read_rx_timestamp;
> >       rte_eth_timesync_read_tx_timestamp;
> > +     rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name;
> > +     rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_addr;
> >
> >  } DPDK_2.0;
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Could you please make sure API consistency?
> Is it ok to add above functions to DPDK_2.1 even though we are in RC
> phase, or need to add to DPDK_2.2?
>
>
Same question. If it's targeted for 2.2 then I will modify this.

Thanks,
Ravi


> Thanks,
> Tetsuya
>
>
>