[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

[Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C]

Hi Thomas,

In general looks good :), I'm going to test this serie and sounds good the feedback from other developers, maybe I'm going to send a version number 9 in order to get a good way together :)

Thanks :)
Mario.
________________________________________
From: Thomas Monjalon [thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 5:34 AM
To: Panu Matilainen; Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; olivier.matz at 6wind.com; Richardson, Bruce
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 15:26, Panu Matilainen:
> On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
> > behaviours.
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > - fix default build dir
> > - RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir).
> > - better kerneldir defaults
> > - fix dpdk_nic_bind symlink
> > - always install doc if generated
> > - doc
> > - pkg/dpdk.spec
> >
>
> Except for the minor nit about examples location (one could bikeshed on
> things like these forever), seems fine to me and quick-n-dirty
> conversion of my own spec didn't reveal any nasty surprises.
>
> It also appears more comprehensive and integrated with other workflows
> than the competing patches so FWIW, you have my ACK :)

Thank you.
I'm going to send a v3.
Mario, what is your opinion about this series?