[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] fix performance/cache resource issues with 128-byte cache line targets

Jerin Jacob jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com
Mon Dec 7 15:33:05 CET 2015


On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:40:13AM -0800, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-07 12:56, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 05:30:50PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2015-12-06 21:29, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > This patchset fixes performance/cache resource issues with 128-byte cache line targets
> > > > found in mbuf and bitmap DPDK libraries
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, we have two DPDK targets(ThunderX and ppc_64) which are based on
> > > > 128-bytes cache line size target.
> > > 
> > > When introducing IBM Power8, we failed to clean the cache line size definition.
> > > I promised to not forget this issue in this thread with Neil:
> > > 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-December/009439.html
> > > 
> > > It is defined in
> > > 	config/defconfig_*
> > > 	mk/machine/*/rte.vars.mk
> > > 	mk/arch/*/rte.vars.mk
> > > 	rte_memory.h
> > > 	rte_kni_common.h
> > > 
> > > It should be defined only in the config files.
> > > When we will introduce a configure script, we should be able to detect it.
> > > 
> > > Please Jerin, as ThunderX maintainer, may you help to fix this old mess?
> > 
> > Yes Thomas, I will takeup this issue when we will have configure script.
> 
> I thought we could start setting the value in only one place.
> The detection in configure script would be another step.

OK Thomas, I have sent the cleanup patch. Please review it.

Jerin

> 
> > apart from that, content of the this patch will be still valid
> > as the fix going to be generating cache line define from the config file.
> 
> 


More information about the dev mailing list