[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] virtio: add virtio v1.0 support
Tan, Jianfeng
jianfeng.tan at intel.com
Tue Dec 29 12:39:47 CET 2015
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:54 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] virtio: add virtio v1.0 support
>
...
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 16 +-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h | 3 +-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 313
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 65 ++++++++
> drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
As legacy VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_XXXs are only used in virtio_pci.c, move these definitions into virtio_pci.c?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> index 9847ed8..1f9de01 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ virtio_vlan_filter_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint16_t vlan_id, int on)
> return virtio_send_command(hw->cvq, &ctrl, &len, 1);
> }
>
> -static void
> +static int
> virtio_negotiate_features(struct virtio_hw *hw)
> {
> uint64_t host_features;
> @@ -949,6 +949,17 @@ virtio_negotiate_features(struct virtio_hw *hw)
> hw->guest_features = vtpci_negotiate_features(hw, host_features);
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "features after negotiate = %"PRIx64,
> hw->guest_features);
> +
> + if (hw->modern) {
> + if (!vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> + "VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 features is not
> enabled");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + vtpci_set_status(hw,
> VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_FEATURES_OK);
As per Linux code drivers/virtio/virtio.c:virtio_finalize_features(), vtpci_set_status() may fail, and there's a double check.
Is it necessary here?
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1032,7 +1043,8 @@ eth_virtio_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>
> /* Tell the host we've known how to drive the device. */
> vtpci_set_status(hw, VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_DRIVER);
> - virtio_negotiate_features(hw);
> + if (virtio_negotiate_features(hw) < 0)
> + return -1;
>
> /* If host does not support status then disable LSC */
> if (!vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS))
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> index ae2d47d..fed9571 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ | \
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX | \
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN | \
> - 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)
> + 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF | \
> + 1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)
>
> /*
> * CQ function prototype
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> index 26b0a0c..7862d7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> DAMAGE.
> */
> #include <stdint.h>
> +#include <linux/pci_regs.h>
Put this "include" into macro RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP followed?
>
> #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP
> #include <dirent.h>
> @@ -448,6 +449,205 @@ static const struct virtio_pci_ops legacy_ops = {
> };
>
>
...
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +modern_set_irq(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, uint16_t vec
> __rte_unused)
> +{
> + /* FIXME: xxx */
> + return 0;
> +}
If not going to support LSC, please give clear indication at related doc. My concern is: this will affect
some users, who are using LSC in legacy virtio. (If LSC works well on legacy virtio?).
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +modern_get_queue_num(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint16_t queue_id)
> +{
> + modern_write16(queue_id, &hw->common_cfg->queue_select);
> + return modern_read16(&hw->common_cfg->queue_size);
> +}
> +
...
>
> +static inline void *
> +get_cfg_addr(struct rte_pci_device *dev, struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> +{
> + uint8_t bar = cap->bar;
> + uint32_t length = cap->length;
> + uint32_t offset = cap->offset;
> + uint8_t *base;
> +
Use a macro to substitute hardcoded "5"?
> + if (unlikely(bar > 5)) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "invalid bar: %u", bar);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
...
> int
> vtpci_init(struct rte_pci_device *dev, struct virtio_hw *hw)
> {
> - hw->vtpci_ops = &legacy_ops;
> + hw->dev = dev;
>
> + /*
> + * Try if we can succeed reading virtio pci caps, which exists
> + * only on modern pci device. If failed, we fallback to legacy
> + * virtio hanlding.
hanlding -> handling
Thanks,
Jianfeng
> + */
...
> +
> struct vq_desc_extra {
> void *cookie;
> uint16_t ndescs;
> --
> 1.9.0
More information about the dev
mailing list