[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] ixgbe: Config VF RSS
Vlad Zolotarov
vladz at cloudius-systems.com
Thu Jan 8 10:43:16 CET 2015
On 01/07/15 08:32, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> It needs config RSS and IXGBE_MRQC and IXGBE_VFPSRTYPE to enable VF RSS.
>
> The psrtype will determine how many queues the received packets will distribute to,
> and the value of psrtype should depends on both facet: max VF rxq number which
> has been negotiated with PF, and the number of rxq specified in config on guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang at intel.com>
>
> Changes in v4:
> - the number of rxq from config should be power of 2 and should not bigger than
> max VF rxq number(negotiated between guest and host).
>
> ---
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c | 15 ++++++
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c
> index dbda9b5..93f6e43 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,21 @@ int ixgbe_pf_host_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MPSAR_LO(hw->mac.num_rar_entries), 0);
> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MPSAR_HI(hw->mac.num_rar_entries), 0);
>
> + /*
> + * VF RSS can support at most 4 queues for each VF, even if
> + * 8 queues are available for each VF, it need refine to 4
> + * queues here due to this limitation, otherwise no queue
> + * will receive any packet even RSS is enabled.
> + */
> + if (eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS) {
> + if (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(eth_dev).nb_q_per_pool == 8) {
> + RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(eth_dev).active = ETH_32_POOLS;
> + RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(eth_dev).nb_q_per_pool = 4;
> + RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(eth_dev).def_pool_q_idx =
> + dev_num_vf(eth_dev) * 4;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* set VMDq map to default PF pool */
> hw->mac.ops.set_vmdq(hw, 0, RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(eth_dev).def_vmdq_idx);
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index f69abda..e83a9ab 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -3327,6 +3327,68 @@ ixgbe_alloc_rx_queue_mbufs(struct igb_rx_queue *rxq)
> }
>
> static int
> +ixgbe_config_vf_rss(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw;
> + uint32_t mrqc;
> +
> + ixgbe_rss_configure(dev);
> +
> + hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> +
> + /* MRQC: enable VF RSS */
> + mrqc = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC);
> + mrqc &= ~IXGBE_MRQC_MRQE_MASK;
> + switch (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active) {
> + case ETH_64_POOLS:
> + mrqc |= IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQRSS64EN;
> + break;
> +
> + case ETH_32_POOLS:
> + case ETH_16_POOLS:
Isn't ETH_16_POOLS mode is invalid for VF RSS? It's what both spec
states and what u handle in this patch in ixgbe_pf_host_configure().
IMHO it would be better to treat this mode value as an error here since
if u get it here it indicates of a SW bug.
> + mrqc |= IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQRSS32EN;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Invalid pool number in IOV mode");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC, mrqc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +ixgbe_config_vf_default(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
> + IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> +
> + switch (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active) {
> + case ETH_64_POOLS:
> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC,
> + IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQEN);
> + break;
> +
> + case ETH_32_POOLS:
> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC,
> + IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQRT4TCEN);
> + break;
> +
> + case ETH_16_POOLS:
> + IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC,
> + IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQRT8TCEN);
> + break;
> + default:
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> + "invalid pool number in IOV mode");
> + break;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> ixgbe_dev_mq_rx_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
> @@ -3358,24 +3420,25 @@ ixgbe_dev_mq_rx_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> default: ixgbe_rss_disable(dev);
> }
> } else {
> - switch (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active) {
> /*
> * SRIOV active scheme
> - * FIXME if support DCB/RSS together with VMDq & SRIOV
> + * Support RSS together with VMDq & SRIOV
> */
> - case ETH_64_POOLS:
> - IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC, IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQEN);
> - break;
> -
> - case ETH_32_POOLS:
> - IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC, IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQRT4TCEN);
> + switch (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode) {
> + case ETH_MQ_RX_RSS:
> + case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS:
> + ixgbe_config_vf_rss(dev);
> break;
>
> - case ETH_16_POOLS:
> - IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC, IXGBE_MRQC_VMDQRT8TCEN);
> - break;
> + /* FIXME if support DCB/RSS together with VMDq & SRIOV */
> + case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB:
> + case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB_RSS:
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> + "Could not support DCB with VMDq & SRIOV");
> + return -1;
> default:
> - PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "invalid pool number in IOV mode");
> + ixgbe_config_vf_default(dev);
> + break;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -3993,6 +4056,19 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
>
> + if (rte_is_power_of_2(dev->data->nb_rx_queues) == 0) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "The number of Rx queue invalid, "
> + "it should be power of 2");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev->data->nb_rx_queues > hw->mac.max_rx_queues) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "The number of Rx queue invalid, "
> + "it should be equal to or less than %d",
> + hw->mac.max_rx_queues);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * When the VF driver issues a IXGBE_VF_RESET request, the PF driver
> * disables the VF receipt of packets if the PF MTU is > 1500.
> @@ -4094,6 +4170,9 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> IXGBE_PSRTYPE_IPV6HDR;
> #endif
>
> + /* Set RQPL for VF RSS according to max Rx queue */
> + psrtype |= (dev->data->nb_rx_queues >> 1) <<
> + IXGBE_PSRTYPE_RQPL_SHIFT;
> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFPSRTYPE, psrtype);
>
> if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.enable_scatter) {
More information about the dev
mailing list