[dpdk-dev] Q on Support for I217 and I218 Intel chipsets.

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Fri Jan 16 11:52:55 CET 2015


On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:54:52PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Kerur
> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:34 PM
> > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Q on Support for I217 and I218 Intel chipsets.
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > 2015-01-09 04:41, Ravi Kerur:
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know how I can move forward on this. If i confine changes
> > > in
> > > > e1000/ directory to e1000_osdep.h file only and the rest in PMD will that
> > > > work? The reason I ask is because of following comment  in README file.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > Few changes to the original FreeBSD sources were made to:
> > > > - Adopt it for PMD usage mode:
> > > >         e1000_osdep.c
> > > >         e1000_osdep.h
> > > > ...
> 
> Yes, if needed you can modify these files.
> In fact, these files are the only 2 that are allowed to be modified inside e1000 sub-directory.
> As I understand you plan to implement E1000_READ_FLASH_REG  and E1000_WRITE_FLASH_REG
> macros properly, correct?
> Konstantin
> 

As a cleanup we should really look to move these two files out of the e1000
subdirectory (and similarly for the ixgbe versions etc.), so as to give a cleaner
and more manageable separation between what can be edited or not.

/Bruce


More information about the dev mailing list