[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] i40e: support of controlling hash functions

[Zhang, Helin]

Hi Thomas

I have sent out v9 of this patch set, with adopting your comments. Thank you very much!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 3:54 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] i40e: support of controlling hash
> functions
> 
> Hi Helin,
> 
> 2014-12-02 10:19, Helin Zhang:
> > Hash filter control has been implemented for i40e. It includes
> > getting/setting,
> > - global hash configurations (hash function type, and symmetric
> >   hash enable per flow type)
> > - symmetric hash enable per port
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_ether/rte_eth_ctrl.h   |  63 ++++++++
> >  lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 294
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Please, could you split ethdev and i40e parts while keeping Konstantin's ack?
I have split it into two patches. Please forgive my typo (splitted->split) in changes logs
which will not occur in commits.
Do I need ask Konstantin to send out his Acked-by again? Or we can just add it?
The only differences is just as below.

--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_eth_ctrl.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_eth_ctrl.h
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ enum rte_eth_hash_function {
  * include symmetric hash enable per flow type and hash function type.
  * Each bit in sym_hash_enable_mask[] indicates if the symmetric hash of the
  * coresponding flow type is enabled or not.
- * Each bit in valid_bit_mask[] indicates if the corresponding bit in
+ * Each bit in valid_bit_mask[] indicates if the coresponding bit in
  * sym_hash_enable_mask[] is valid or not. For the configurations gotten, it
  * also means if the flow type is supported by hardware or not.
  */
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ struct rte_eth_hash_global_conf {
        enum rte_eth_hash_function hash_func; /**< Hash function type */
        /** Bit mask for symmetric hash enable per flow type */
        uint32_t sym_hash_enable_mask[RTE_SYM_HASH_MASK_ARRAY_SIZE];
-       /** Bit mask indicates if the corresponding bit is valid */
+       /** Bit mask indicates if the coresponding bit is valid */
        uint32_t valid_bit_mask[RTE_SYM_HASH_MASK_ARRAY_SIZE];
 };
 
@@ -502,12 +502,12 @@ struct rte_eth_hash_global_conf {
  * type of 'RTE_ETH_FILTER_HASH' and its operations.
  */
 struct rte_eth_hash_filter_info {
-       enum rte_eth_hash_filter_info_type info_type; /**< Information type */
-       /** Details of hash filter information */
+       enum rte_eth_hash_filter_info_type info_type; /**< Information type. */
+       /** Details of hash filter infomation */
        union {
-               /** For RTE_ETH_HASH_FILTER_SYM_HASH_ENA_PER_PORT */
+               /* For RTE_ETH_HASH_FILTER_SYM_HASH_ENA_PER_PORT */
                uint8_t enable;
-               /** Global configurations of hash filter */
+               /* Global configurations of hash filter */
                struct rte_eth_hash_global_conf global_conf;
        } info;
 };

> 
> [...]
> > + * Each bit in valid_bit_mask[] indicates if the coresponding bit in
> 
> Typo: corresponding
Thanks, it is corrected in v9.

> 
> [...]
> > +	/** Bit mask indicates if the coresponding bit is valid */
> 
> Same typo
Thanks, it is corrected in v9.

> 
> [...]
> > +	/** Details of hash filter infomation */
> 
> Typo: information
Thanks, it is corrected in v9.

> 
> > +	union {
> > +		/* For RTE_ETH_HASH_FILTER_SYM_HASH_ENA_PER_PORT */
> > +		uint8_t enable;
> > +		/* Global configurations of hash filter */
> > +		struct rte_eth_hash_global_conf global_conf;
> > +	} info;
> 
> Why these comments are not doxygen'ed?
Thanks, it is enabled in v9.

> 
> Sorry for nitpicking, that's the last review pass ;)
Don't worry, it is not nitpicking from my point of view. I really appreciate your hard works!
Thank you!

Regards,
Helin

> --
> Thomas