[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added missing extern 'C' decls in mode4 header files

[Declan Doherty]

On 30/01/15 12:11, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Doherty, Declan
> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:42 PM
> > To: Wodkowski, PawelX; Thomas Monjalon
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added missing extern 'C' decls in mode4 header
> > files
> >
> > On 30/01/15 10:56, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 11:21 AM
> >>> To: Wodkowski, PawelX
> >>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added missing extern 'C' decls in mode4
> > header
> >>> files
> >>>
> >>> Hi Pawel,
> >>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski at intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.h         |    8 ++++++++
> >>>>    lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad_private.h |    8 ++++++++
> >>>
> >>> Why adding extern C in a private header file?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thomas
> >>
> >> To be consistent with rte_eth_bond_private.h where it is included.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > We only need the decls on the public headers exported by the
> > librte_pmd_bond makefile, so there is no need to modify
> > rte_eth_bond_private.h as it should never be linked to directly by
> > external code.
>
> I modified rte_eth_bond_8023ad_private.h not rte_eth_bond_private.h.
> In rte_eth_bond_private.h those declarations are present already.
> If so those declarations should be removed from rte_eth_bond_private.h.
>
> I can do this in v2 if you accept this.
>
Sure, that sounds good to me.