[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: move librte_malloc to eal/common

[Thomas Monjalon]

2015-06-26 16:29, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/*
>  F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/*
>  F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/
>  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
> +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
>  F: app/test/test_alarm.c
>  F: app/test/test_atomic.c
>  F: app/test/test_byteorder.c
> @@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ F: app/test/test_spinlock.c
>  F: app/test/test_string_fns.c
>  F: app/test/test_tailq.c
>  F: app/test/test_version.c
> +F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> +F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c

I think we should keep a separate maintainer section for memory allocator
in EAL. I suggest this:

Memory allocation
M: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>
F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_mem*
F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_malloc.h
F: lib/librte_eal/common/*malloc*
F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mem*
F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_hugepages.h
F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
F: app/test/test_malloc.c
F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c

>  Secondary process
>  K: RTE_PROC_
> @@ -155,12 +158,6 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/
>  Core Libraries
>  --------------
>  
> -Dynamic memory
> -F: lib/librte_malloc/
> -F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
> -F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> -F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
> -
>  Memory pool