[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: Fix wrong message in testpmd

[Bruce Richardson]

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 07:16:21AM +0000, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> Any comments? This is a bug fix, not a feature.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> 
> On 6/24/2015 3:56 PM, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> > When close one port twice, testpmd will give out wrong messagse.
> >
> > testpmd> port stop  0
> > Stopping ports...
> > Checking link statuses...
> > Port 0 Link Up - speed 0 Mbps - full-duplex
> > Port 1 Link Up - speed 0 Mbps - full-duplex
> > Done
> > testpmd> port close 0
> > Closing ports...
> > Done
> > testpmd> port close 0
> > Closing ports...
> > Port 0 is now not stopped
> > Done
> > testpmd> 
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > index 3057791..907cda3 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -1534,6 +1534,12 @@ close_port(portid_t pid)
> >  
> >  		port = &ports[pi];
> >  		if (rte_atomic16_cmpset(&(port->port_status),
> > +			RTE_PORT_CLOSED, RTE_PORT_CLOSED) == 1) {
> > +			printf("Port %d is already closed\n", pi);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (rte_atomic16_cmpset(&(port->port_status),
> >  			RTE_PORT_STOPPED, RTE_PORT_HANDLING) == 0) {
> >  			printf("Port %d is now not stopped\n", pi);
> >  			continue;

I know it's not part of your change, but "Now not stopped" doesn't really seem
right to me. What is the message actually trying to report?

/Bruce
>