[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: fix tunnel flags check

Thomas Monjalon thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Thu Jul 16 02:13:13 CEST 2015


2015-07-15 23:57, Zhang, Helin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > A packet is tunnelled if the tunnel type is identified or if it has an inner part.
> > 
> > Fix also a typo in RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_MASK.
> > 
> > Fixes: f295a00a2b44 ("mbuf: add definitions of unified packet types")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
|...]
> >  /* Check if it is a tunneling packet */
> >  -#define RTE_ETH_IS_TUNNEL_PKT(ptype) ((ptype) & RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_MASK)
> > +#define RTE_ETH_IS_TUNNEL_PKT(ptype) ((ptype) & (RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_MASK | \
> > + RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L2_MASK | \
> > + RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_MASK | \
> > + RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_MASK))
> 
> Could you help to explain more of why here?
> My understanding is that if an inner one can be recognized, there must be a tunnel type there.

Not always.
It was my comment in mlx4 patch:
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-July/021702.html
Currently we can know that mlx4 has detected a tunnel but don't know which one.



More information about the dev mailing list