[dpdk-dev] [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison
Jun Xiao
jun.xiao at cloudnetengine.com
Tue Jul 21 20:28:09 CEST 2015
I'd like to hope that's my methodology problem, but I just follow the installation guide without any customization.
Hi Mark, do you have any performance data share with us? Maybe we are using different type of workloads, like I mentioned I am using typical data center workload, I guess you are talking about NFV type of workload?
Thanks,
Jun
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 2:14 AM, Gray, Mark D <mark.d.gray at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jun
>> Xiao
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:01 PM
>> To: discuss; dev
>> Subject: [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison
>>
>> After CloudNetEngine vswitch technical preview is launched, we received
>> quite a few queries on vswitches performance comparison, but we cannot
>> simply give a test result on our platform because performance varies on
>> different H/Ws and different workloads, and that's why we encourage you to
>> try the evaluation package to get real data on your setup.
>>
>> Anyway, we share a little more performance data on our H/W which is a
>> comparison among native kernel OVS/OVS-DPDK/CNE vswitch under the
>> most common workload:
>> concurrent bi-directional TCP traffics cross hosts, and hope you can have a
>> rough idea.
>> http://www.cloudnetengine.com/weblog/2015/07/22/vswitches-
>> performance-comparison/
>
> I think there is an issue with you methodology. ovs-dpdk performance should be
> significantly higher than kernel ovs.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jun
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at openvswitch.org
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the dev
mailing list