[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

[Qiu, Michael]

On 6/1/2015 9:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-05-12 05:30, Qiu, Michael:
>> Hi, thomas
>>
>> What about this patch?
> It seems this patch was not *really* sent to dev at dpdk.org.
> Please re-send, keeping the Acked-by line.

OK, I will resend it.

Thanks,
Michael
>> On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote:
>>> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com]
>>>> From: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs
>>>> the device supported.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>>>> index 0312fad..297ff88 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>>>> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>>  	dev_info->max_tx_queues      = hw->mac.max_queues;
>>>>  	dev_info->max_mac_addrs      = 1;
>>>>  	dev_info->max_hash_mac_addrs = 0;
>>>> -	dev_info->max_vfs            = FM10K_MAX_VF_NUM;
>>>> +	dev_info->max_vfs            = dev->pci_dev->max_vfs;
>>>>  	dev_info->max_vmdq_pools     = ETH_64_POOLS;
>>>>  	dev_info->rx_offload_capa =
>>>>  		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.3
>>> Acked-by Jing Chen <jing.d.chen at intel.com>
>
>