[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] ixgbe: Cleanups

[Ananyev, Konstantin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wodkowski, PawelX
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 11:09 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Vlad Zolotarov; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] ixgbe: Cleanups
> 
> On 2015-03-09 11:49, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
> >> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 10:21 AM
> >> To: dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] ixgbe: Cleanups
> >>
> >>     - Removed the not needed casting.
> >>     - ixgbe_dev_rx_init(): shorten the lines by defining a local alias variable to access
> >>                            &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz at cloudius-systems.com>
> >> ---
> >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> >>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >> index 72c65df..609b5fd 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >> @@ -1032,8 +1032,7 @@ ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(struct igb_rx_queue *rxq)
> >>   	int diag, i;
> >>
> >>   	/* allocate buffers in bulk directly into the S/W ring */
> >> -	alloc_idx = (uint16_t)(rxq->rx_free_trigger -
> >> -				(rxq->rx_free_thresh - 1));
> >> +	alloc_idx = rxq->rx_free_trigger - (rxq->rx_free_thresh - 1);
> >
> > I think all these extra casts came in to keep icc 12.* compiling without warnings.
> > I am agree that they are unnecessary.
> > Though if we still have to support icc 12.* we either need to keep them, or find
> > some other way to keep it happy.
> > Konstantin
> >
> 
> What warnings icc 12.* is throwing? 

Try and see :)

>Only warning I can think of here is
> signed -> unsigned implicit cast. 

If I remember things correctly, it considered result at right side of '=' operator as unsigned int,
and then complained that we assign it to smaller size (unsigned short) operand.  

>Changing '1' to '1U' helps?

Don't think so, but you are welcome to try.

Konstantin

> 
> 
> --
> Pawel