[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3]: bug fixes in the ixgbe PF PMD Rx flow

[Vladislav Zolotarov]

On Mar 13, 2015 2:51 PM, "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Vlad,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz at cloudius-systems.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:52 AM
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3]: bug fixes in the ixgbe PF PMD
Rx flow
> >
> >
> >
> > On 03/13/15 13:07, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:17 PM
> > >> To: dev at dpdk.org
> > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3]: bug fixes in the ixgbe PF PMD Rx
flow
> > >>
> > >> This series contains some bug fixes that were found during my work
on the ixgbe LRO
> > >> patches. Sending this series separately on Thomas request so that it
may be integrated
> > >> into the 2.0 release.
> > >>
> > >> New in v3:
> > >>     - Adjusted to the new structs naming in the master.
> > >>     - Fixed rx_bulk_alloc_allowed and rx_vec_allowed initialization:
> > >>        - Don't set them to FALSE in rte_eth_dev_stop() flow - the
following
> > >>          rte_eth_dev_start() will need them.
> > >>        - Reset them to TRUE in rte_eth_dev_configure() and not in a
probe() flow.
> > >>          This will ensure the proper behaviour if port is
re-configured.
> > >>     - Rename:
> > >>        - ixgbe_rx_vec_condition_check() ->
ixgbe_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check()
> > >>        - set_rx_function() -> ixgbe_set_rx_function()
> > >>     - Clean up the logic in ixgbe_set_rx_function().
> > >>     - Define stubs with __attribute__((weak)) instead of using
#ifdef's.
> > >>     - Styling: beautify ixgbe_rxtx.h a bit.
> > >>
> > >> New in v2:
> > >>     - Fixed a compilation failure.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Vlad Zolotarov (3):
> > >>    ixgbe: Use the rte_le_to_cpu_xx()/rte_cpu_to_le_xx() when
> > >>      reading/setting HW ring descriptor fields
> > >>    ixgbe: Bug fix: Properly configure Rx CRC stripping for x540
devices
> > >>    ixgbe: Unify the rx_pkt_bulk callback initialization
> > >>
> > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h |   2 +
> > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c     |  13 +-
> > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c       | 216
+++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h       |  28 ++++-
> > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c   |   2 +-
> > >>   5 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > >
> > > Just one nit:
> > >
> > > +int __attribute__((weak)) ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(
> > > +   struct ixgbe_rx_queue __rte_unused *rxq)
> > > +{
> > >
> > > Please use notation:
> > > int __attribute__((weak))
> > > ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(struct ixgbe_rx_queue __rte_unused *rxq)
> > >
> > > To keep up with the rest of the code, plus makes much easier to read.
> >
> > I took an example from kni/ethtool/igb/kcompat.h for a template but no
> > problem.
> > Do u want me to respin or it's ok? I will use this format for the
> > follow-up LRO patch anyway...
>
> Doing that in LRO patch set is ok.
> No need for respin that one, I think.

Great! Thanks a lot for reviewing this.

Thomas, it seems like ixgbe maintainer gives this series a green light!..
;)

> Konstantin
>
> >
> > >
> > >> --
> > >> 2.1.0
>