[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] EAL: move rte_common_vect.h into arch/x86
Ananyev, Konstantin
konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
Wed Mar 18 16:24:05 CET 2015
Hi Thomas,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 1:14 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] EAL: move rte_common_vect.h into arch/x86
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> 2015-03-18 10:58, Konstantin Ananyev:
> > lib/librte_eal/common/Makefile | 1 -
> > .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_common_vect.h | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common_vect.h | 128 ---------------------
>
> I think rte_vect.h is a better name as common is not anymore relevant.
I don't mind, but it means more changes - all files which include it, would need to be changed.
> Should we add an empty file in ppc_64 directory?
I thought about that too, but it seems not necessary.
It is included by:
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h
lib/librte_acl/rte_acl_osdep.h
As I understand, neither LPM, neither ACL are supported on PPC right now.
Again, if we'll provide an empty one for PPC, it wouldn't help to compile LPM/ACL on PPC anyway,
as both use SSE instrincts inside their code.
Konstantin
More information about the dev
mailing list