[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] claim responsibility for KVM virtio PMD, vhost backend, and XEN virtio solution.

[Xie, Huawei]

On 3/30/2015 8:25 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-03-30 08:31, Xie, Huawei:
>> On 3/9/2015 11:45 PM, Huawei Xie wrote:
>>> ---
>>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 07fdf5e..b4327d3 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ F: app/test-pmd/mempool_*
>>>  F: examples/vhost_xen/
>>>  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/intel_dpdk_xen_based_packet_switch_sol.rst
>>>  
>>> +Linux Xen VIRTIO
>>> +M: Huawei Xie <huawei.xie at intel.com>
>>> +F: lib/librte_pmd_xenvirt/
>>> +F: examples/vhost_xen/
>>> +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/intel_dpdk_xen_based_packet_switch_sol.rst
>>> +
>>>  FreeBSD EAL (with overlaps)
>>>  M: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
>>>  F: lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/Makefile
>>> @@ -226,6 +232,7 @@ F: lib/librte_pmd_mlx4/
>>>  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/mlx4_poll_mode_drv.rst
>>>  
>>>  RedHat virtio
>>> +M: Huawei Xie <huawei.xie at intel.com>
>>>  M: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang at intel.com>
>>>  F: lib/librte_pmd_virtio/
>>>  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv_emulated_virtio_nic.rst
>> Thomas:
>> Comments with this patch? Need i add "MAINTAINERS:" into the subject?
> This patch is wrong because you are duplicating an existing section.
> I think you want to split Xen support maintenance. If you are sure it's a
> good idea, please send a correct patch.
Yes, i am mainly the author of XEN virtio PMD and host part and would
like to review that part.
Should i split those two sections and move XEN virtio PMD and host part
to driver section?

> About vhost, maybe you want to split virtio and vhost?
>
About vhost, i will maintain those two parts. Is there issue with the
format?
>