[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

[Olivier MATZ]

Hi Huilong,

On 05/07/2015 03:57 AM, Xu, HuilongX wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
> Today I find a compile error, when I test ip fragment on dpdk.org. would you check this?  thanks a lot.
> My dpdk.org commit: a6d71fa7146cc04320c2485d6dde44c1d888d652
> The compile error as below:
> CC main.o
> /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c: In function 'init_mem':
> /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: error: 'MBUF_DATA_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
>       0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, socket);
>          ^
> /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Sure, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting.

Regards,
Olivier


>
>
> Best regards
>
> huilong
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
>
> Hi,
>
> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM
>>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>>> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss at linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; nhorman at tuxdriver.com; olivier.matz at 6wind.com
>>> Subject: [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
>>>
>>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect
>>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also
>>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on
>>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements
>>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the
>>> last patches easier.
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
>
> When does this series get merged?
>
> Regards,
>
> Zoltan
>