[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

[Ananyev, Konstantin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:32 AM
> To: Xu, HuilongX; Zoltan Kiss; Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Zhang, Helin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
> 
> Hi Huilong,
> 
> On 05/07/2015 03:57 AM, Xu, HuilongX wrote:
> > Hi Olivier,
> > Today I find a compile error, when I test ip fragment on dpdk.org. would you check this?  thanks a lot.
> > My dpdk.org commit: a6d71fa7146cc04320c2485d6dde44c1d888d652
> > The compile error as below:
> > CC main.o
> > /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c: In function 'init_mem':
> > /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: error: 'MBUF_DATA_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >       0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, socket);
> >          ^
> > /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
> appears in
> 
> Sure, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting.

Looks like a typo here.
Should be fixed by http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/017119.html.
Konstantin

> 
> Regards,
> Olivier
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > huilong
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
> > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM
> >>> To: dev at dpdk.org
> >>> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss at linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; nhorman at tuxdriver.com; olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> >>> Subject: [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
> >>>
> >>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect
> >>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also
> >>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on
> >>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements
> >>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the
> >>> last patches easier.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> >
> > When does this series get merged?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Zoltan
> >