[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

[Qiu, Michael]

Hi, thomas

What about this patch?

Thanks,
Michael
On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote:
> Hi, 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:25 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Chen, Jing D; Qiu, Michael
>> Subject: [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD
>>
>> From: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com>
>>
>> In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs
>> the device supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>> b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>> index 0312fad..297ff88 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
>> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>  	dev_info->max_tx_queues      = hw->mac.max_queues;
>>  	dev_info->max_mac_addrs      = 1;
>>  	dev_info->max_hash_mac_addrs = 0;
>> -	dev_info->max_vfs            = FM10K_MAX_VF_NUM;
>> +	dev_info->max_vfs            = dev->pci_dev->max_vfs;
>>  	dev_info->max_vmdq_pools     = ETH_64_POOLS;
>>  	dev_info->rx_offload_capa =
>>  		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
>> --
>> 1.9.3
> Acked-by Jing Chen <jing.d.chen at intel.com>
>
>