[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] cxgbe: Optimize forwarding performance for 40G

[Rahul Lakkireddy]

On Monday, October 10/05/15, 2015 at 20:37:31 +0530, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> On Monday, October 10/05/15, 2015 at 07:09:27 -0700, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi Rahul,
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > > This additional check seems redundant for single segment
> > > > > packets since rte_pktmbuf_free_seg also performs rte_mbuf_sanity_check.
> > > > >
> > > > > Several PMDs already prefer to use rte_pktmbuf_free_seg directly over
> > > > > rte_pktmbuf_free as it is faster.
> > > >
> > > > Other PMDs use rte_pktmbuf_free_seg() as each TD has an associated
> > > > with it segment. So as HW is done with the TD, SW frees associated segment.
> > > > In your case I don't see any point in re-implementing rte_pktmbuf_free() manually,
> > > > and I don't think it would be any faster.
> > > >
> > > > Konstantin
> > > 
> > > As I mentioned below, I am clearly seeing a difference of 1 Mpps. And 1
> > > Mpps is not a small difference IMHO.
> > 
> > Agree with you here - it is a significant difference.
> > 
> > > 
> > > When running l3fwd with 8 queues, I also collected a perf report.
> > > When using rte_pktmbuf_free, I see that it eats up around 6% cpu as
> > > below in perf top report:-
> > > --------------------
> > > 32.00%  l3fwd                        [.] cxgbe_poll
> > > 22.25%  l3fwd                        [.] t4_eth_xmit
> > > 20.30%  l3fwd                        [.] main_loop
> > >  6.77%  l3fwd                        [.] rte_pktmbuf_free
> > >  4.86%  l3fwd                        [.] refill_fl_usembufs
> > >  2.00%  l3fwd                        [.] write_sgl
> > > .....
> > > --------------------
> > > 
> > > While, when using rte_pktmbuf_free_seg directly, I don't see above
> > > problem. perf top report now comes as:-
> > > -------------------
> > > 33.36%  l3fwd                        [.] cxgbe_poll
> > > 32.69%  l3fwd                        [.] t4_eth_xmit
> > > 19.05%  l3fwd                        [.] main_loop
> > >  5.21%  l3fwd                        [.] refill_fl_usembufs
> > >  2.40%  l3fwd                        [.] write_sgl
> > > ....
> > > -------------------
> > 
> > I don't think these 6% disappeared anywhere.
> > As I can see, now t4_eth_xmit() increased by roughly same amount
> > (you still have same job to do).
> 
> Right.
> 
> > To me it looks like in that case compiler didn't really inline rte_pktmbuf_free().
> > Wonder can you add 'always_inline' attribute to the  rte_pktmbuf_free(),
> > and see would it make any difference?
> > 
> > Konstantin 
> 
> I will try out above and update further.
> 

Tried always_inline and didn't see any difference in performance in
RHEL 6.4 with gcc 4.4.7, but was seeing 1 MPPS improvement with the
above block.

I've moved to latest RHEL 7.1 with gcc 4.8.3 and tried both
always_inline and the above block and I'm not seeing any difference
for both.

Will drop this block and submit a v2.

Thanks for the review Aaron and Konstantin.

Thanks,
Rahul