[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] null: export eth_dev_null_create

[Tetsuya Mukawa]

On 2015/10/14 21:42, Jastrzebski, MichalX K wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tetsuya Mukawa
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:35 AM
>> To: Kulasek, TomaszX; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] null: export eth_dev_null_create
>>
>> On 2015/09/30 23:05, Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/null/Makefile                 |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c           |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.h           |   40
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/net/null/rte_pmd_null_version.map |    7 +++++
>>>  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.h
>> Acked-by: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa at igel.co.jp>
> Hi Tetsuya,
> Thank You for a review and acking patches. 
> There are 5 remaining patches in a patch-set: 
>
> [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/9] bonding: rss dynamic configuration
> [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/9] test: dynamic rss configuration
> [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/9] bonding: per queue stats
> [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/9] doc: fixed spellings and typos
> [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 9/9] doc: dynamic rss configuration for bonding
>
> Could You also review them and ack if You agree with that implementation, please?

Hi MichalX,

I've checked above patches. But I am sorry that I am not a correct
person to ack your patches.
To review it correctly, at least knowledge about RSS and bonding PMD are
needed, but honestly I am not familiar with RSS.
Is it possible to find a correct person who can ack it?

BTW, I've checked the patch from the following point of view. It may
help other reviewers.
(I've checked after fixing null PMD issues I've found today, please
check an email I've sent to Tomasz)
 - No fatal errors are reported by checkpatch.pl.
    - Some style warnings are reported, but I guess we can ignore it.
 - No compile error with gcc-4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9/5, clang and icc.
 - No missing symbol.
 - No compile error for docs.
 - No compile error for examples.

Thanks,
Tetsuya