[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] i40e: add additional ieee1588 support functions

De Lara Guarch, Pablo pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com
Fri Oct 30 12:33:20 CET 2015


Hi Konstantin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 11:20 AM
> To: Mrzyglod, DanielX T; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] i40e: add additional ieee1588 support
> functions
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mrzyglod
> > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 9:43 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] i40e: add additional ieee1588 support
> functions
> >
> > From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
> >
> > Add additional functions to support the existing IEEE1588
> > functionality and to enable getting, setting and adjusting
> > the device time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod at intel.com>

[...]

> 
> These 3 functions above are redefined for each PMD in your patch.
> I think it is worth to move it to the upper layer (rte_ethdev, rte_net) to avoid
> code duplication.
> Thanks
> Kinstantin

We thought about that, but we didn't know what the best place was for them.
Looking at the functions in rte_ethdev, they look quite different compared to these ones,
so we thought it wasn't the appropriate place. Do you think that is the best place?

Thanks,
Pablo


More information about the dev mailing list