[dpdk-dev] Memory leak when adding/removing vhost_user ports
Christian Ehrhardt
christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com
Wed Apr 20 08:18:49 CEST 2016
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:33:50PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
[...]
> > With that applied one (and only one) of my two guests looses
> connectivity after
> > removing the ports the first time.
>
> Yeah, that's should be because I invoked the "->destroy_device()"
> callback.
>
Shouldn't that not only destroy the particular vhost_user device I remove?
See below for some better details on the test to clarify that.
BTW, I'm curious how do you do the test? I saw you added 256 ports, but
> with 2 guests only? So, 254 of them are idle, just for testing the
> memory leak bug?
>
Maybe I should describe it better:
1. Spawn some vhost-user ports (40 in my case)
2. Spawn a pair of guests that connect via four of those ports per guest
3. Guests only intialize one of that vhost_user based NICs
4. check connectivity between guests via the vhost_user based connection
(working at this stage)
LOOP 5-7:
5. add ports 41-512
6. remove ports 41-512
7. check connectivity between guests via the vhost_user based connection
So the vhost_user ports the guests are using are never deleted.
Only some extra (not even used) ports are added&removed in the loop to
search for potential leaks over a longer lifetime of an openvswitch-dpdk
based solution.
More information about the dev
mailing list