[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio_user: fix dev not freed after init error
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Fri Aug 5 18:34:13 CEST 2016
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:36:43 +0000
Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan at intel.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> index daef09b..62ccb0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,17 @@ virtio_user_eth_dev_alloc(const char *name)
> return eth_dev;
> }
>
> +static void
> +virtio_user_eth_dev_free(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> +{
> + struct rte_eth_dev_data *data = eth_dev->data;
> + struct virtio_hw *hw = data->dev_private;
> +
> + rte_free(hw->virtio_user_dev);
> + rte_free(hw);
> + rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev);
> +}
> +
> /* Dev initialization routine. Invoked once for each virtio vdev at
> * EAL init time, see rte_eal_dev_init().
> * Returns 0 on success.
> @@ -328,7 +339,7 @@ virtio_user_pmd_devinit(const char *name, const char *params)
> uint64_t queue_size = VIRTIO_USER_DEF_Q_SZ;
> char *path = NULL;
> char *mac_addr = NULL;
> - int ret = -1;
> + int result = -1, ret;
It is not clear why two return value variables are needed?
>
> if (!params || params[0] == '\0') {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "arg %s is mandatory for virtio_user",
> @@ -411,15 +422,19 @@ virtio_user_pmd_devinit(const char *name, const char *params)
>
> hw = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> if (virtio_user_dev_init(hw->virtio_user_dev, path, queues, cq,
> - queue_size, mac_addr) < 0)
> + queue_size, mac_addr) < 0) {
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "virtio_user_dev_init fails");
> + virtio_user_eth_dev_free(eth_dev);
> goto end;
> + }
>
> /* previously called by rte_eal_pci_probe() for physical dev */
> if (eth_virtio_dev_init(eth_dev) < 0) {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "eth_virtio_dev_init fails");
> + virtio_user_eth_dev_free(eth_dev);
> goto end;
> }
> - ret = 0;
> + result = 0;
>
> end:
> if (kvlist)
> @@ -428,7 +443,7 @@ end:
> free(path);
> if (mac_addr)
> free(mac_addr);
Unrelated, but this code could eliminate those if () tests.
> - return ret;
> + return result;
> }
More information about the dev
mailing list