[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: remove VLAN strip option

[Tan, Jianfeng]

Hi Maxime,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:52 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: remove VLAN strip option
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/18/2016 07:46 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> > When VMDQ is enabled, different NICs have different behaviors for
> > disabling VLAN strip. In detail, i40e only enables/disables it of
> > PF's main vsi; fm10k cannot disable VLAN strip, etc. We now remove
> > this option, --vlan-strip, to reduce any confusion. And now, VLAN
> > strip will be enabled and cannot be disabled.
> >
> > Reported-by: Qian Xu <qian.q.xu at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst | 11 ++++-------
> >  examples/vhost/main.c              | 26 +-------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> Minor comment below. Other than that:
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> 
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst
> b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst
> > index 2b7defc..a204f78 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst
> > @@ -496,13 +496,10 @@ due to the large and complex code, it's better to
> redesign it than fixing
> >  it to make it work again. Hence, zero copy may be added back later.
> >
> >  **VLAN strip.**
> > -The VLAN strip option enable/disable the VLAN strip on host, if disabled,
> the guest will receive the packets with VLAN tag.
> > -It is enabled by default.
> > -
> > -.. code-block:: console
> > -
> > -    ./vhost-switch -c f -n 4 --socket-mem 1024 --huge-dir /mnt/huge \
> > -     -- --vlan-strip [0, 1]
> > +VLAN strip option is removed, because different NICs have different
> behaviors
> > +when disabling VLAN strip. Such feature, which heavily depends on
> hardware,
> > +should be removed from this example to deduce confusion. Now, VLAN
> strip is
> I'm not a native English speaker, but I would use "reduce" instead of
> "deduce" here. I might be wrong, so feel free to keep as-is if
> appropriate.

Nice catch! Yes, "reduce" instead of "deduce".

Thanks,
Jianfeng

> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime