[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/ixgbe: implement new Rx checksum flag

Wang, Xiao W xiao.w.wang at intel.com
Wed Aug 31 11:07:43 CEST 2016


Hi Olivier,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 3:30 PM
> To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang at intel.com>; Chen, Jing D
> <jing.d.chen at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] net/ixgbe: implement new Rx checksum flag
> 
> Hi Xiao,
> 
> On 08/25/2016 07:48 PM, Xiao Wang wrote:
> > Add CKSUM_GOOD flag to distinguish a good checksum from an unknown
> one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > index 8a306b0..d2dc82a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -1345,7 +1345,9 @@ rx_desc_error_to_pkt_flags(uint32_t rx_status)
> >  	 * Bit 30: L4I, L4I integrity error
> >  	 */
> >  	static uint64_t error_to_pkt_flags_map[4] = {
> > -		0,  PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD, PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
> > +		PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD,
> > +		PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
> > +		PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD,
> >  		PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD
> >  	};
> >  	pkt_flags = error_to_pkt_flags_map[(rx_status >>
> >
> 
> I think this would somehow conflict with the patch adding the support of
> Rx checksum offload in vector receive function:
> 
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14630/
> 
> Depending on which one is pushed first, the second one would need to be
> reworked.
> 
> Olivier

Yes, since your patch supports cksum in vector Rx, I'll add the new cksum flags for it
based on your patch.

Best Regards,
Xiao


More information about the dev mailing list