[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues than bonding device

[Iremonger, Bernard]

Hi Stephen,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues
> than bonding device
> 
> 2016-02-03 15:17, Declan Doherty:
> > On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > Hi Eric, Stephen, Declan,
> > >
> > > all patches of the set apart from this one and the next (nos 6 & 7)
> > > have no comments and have been acked. Is there a resolution on these
> > > two patches, so they can be acked and merged?
> >
> > Hey Bruce, Eric, Stephen, sorry about leaving this patchset hanging
> > around. Can you apply patches 1-5 & patch 8 in this patch set. I've
> > reviewed and acked all of those patches and I believe they are good
> > tof go. I need to give further feedback on patches 6 and 7, as I would
> > like to avoid bring further rte_ring buffering into the bonded device
> > if possible and I think this should be possible but I haven't had time
> > to prototype any alternatives but that shouldn't stop the other
> > patches being applied.
> 
> Picking some patches in a series makes tracking confusing.
> The better solution is to re-send the series with only the desired patches.
> When re-sending, do not forget to embed the acks from the previous
> version, thanks.

Could you send a V2 of this patch set without patches 6 and 7.
The other 6 patches have been acked  already.

Regards,

Bernard.