[dpdk-dev] Question about patchset order.
Thomas Monjalon
thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Tue Feb 23 18:34:38 CET 2016
2016-02-23 16:17, Kobylinski, MichalX:
> Hi Thomas,
> I sent in January a patch-set that extends to 24 bits a next_hop field in lpm library:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/
>
> also Jerin Jakob sent his patch-set with ARM architecture support in lpm library.
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10478/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10479/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10480/
>
> Could you write please, in which order do you prefer to apply these two patch-sets?
> This information will be helpful to predict the risk and estimate additional work.
Thanks for bringing up the LPM patches.
I would prefer to follow the advice of Bruce who has well followed
these interactions.
More information about the dev
mailing list