[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/14] virtio: pci: extend virtio pci rw api for vfio interface
Santosh Shukla
sshukla at mvista.com
Mon Jan 18 08:39:48 CET 2016
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/14/2016 09:28 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> So far virtio handle rw access for uio / ioport interface, This patch to extend
>> the support for vfio interface. For that introducing private struct
>> virtio_vfio_dev{
>> - is_vfio
>> - pci_dev
>> };
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com>
>> ---
>> v3->v4:
>> - Removed #indef RTE_EAL_VFIO and made it arch agnostic such now virtio_pci
>> rd/wr api to handle both vfio and ig_uio/ioport interfaces, depending upon
>> is_vfio flags set or unset.
>> - Tested for x86 for igb_uio and vfio interface, also tested for arm64 for vfio
>> interface.
>>
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Interesting. I'm working on IOMMU cooperation with virtio[1]. For pmd,
> it looks like the only thing missed is RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING for
> virito-net pmd.
>
not missing anymore, I am using rte_eal_pci_map() api so to map virtio
pci dev to userspace.
> So I'm curious whether this is still necessary if IOMMU can work with
> virito in the future.
>
So far I'm using pmd driver in vfio-noiommu way. AFAIk, pmd driver use
dma for tx side. I glanced through your patch, to me it would be
interesting to try out, but right now I am not sure. We'll come back I
guess. Thanks
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg337079.html
>
> Thanks
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>> index 8b5b031..8526c07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
>> #endif
>>
>> #include <rte_ethdev.h>
>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>> +#include "virtio_vfio_rw.h"
>>
>> struct virtqueue;
>>
>> @@ -165,6 +167,14 @@ struct virtqueue;
>> */
>> #define VIRTIO_MAX_VIRTQUEUES 8
>>
>> +/* For vfio only */
>> +struct virtio_vfio_dev {
>> + bool is_vfio; /* True: vfio i/f,
>> + * False: not a vfio i/f
>> + */
>> + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /* vfio dev */
>> +};
>> +
>> struct virtio_hw {
>> struct virtqueue *cvq;
>> uint32_t io_base;
>> @@ -176,6 +186,7 @@ struct virtio_hw {
>> uint8_t use_msix;
>> uint8_t started;
>> uint8_t mac_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev dev;
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -231,20 +242,65 @@ outl_p(unsigned int data, unsigned int port)
>> #define VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, reg) \
>> (unsigned short)((hw)->io_base + (reg))
>>
>> -#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_1(hw, reg) \
>> - inb((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
>> -#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_1(hw, reg, value) \
>> - outb_p((unsigned char)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
>> -
>> -#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_2(hw, reg) \
>> - inw((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
>> -#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_2(hw, reg, value) \
>> - outw_p((unsigned short)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
>> -
>> -#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_4(hw, reg) \
>> - inl((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
>> -#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_4(hw, reg, value) \
>> - outl_p((unsigned int)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
>> +#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_1(hw, reg) \
>> +({ \
>> + uint8_t ret; \
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev; \
>> + (vdev) = (&(hw)->dev); \
>> + (((vdev)->is_vfio) ? \
>> + (ioport_inb(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, &ret)) : \
>> + ((ret) = (inb((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))))); \
>> + ret; \
>> +})
>> +
>> +#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_1(hw, reg, value) \
>> +({ \
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev; \
>> + (vdev) = (&(hw)->dev); \
>> + (((vdev)->is_vfio) ? \
>> + (ioport_outb_p(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, (uint8_t)(value))) : \
>> + (outb_p((unsigned char)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg)))))); \
>> +})
>> +
>> +#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_2(hw, reg) \
>> +({ \
>> + uint16_t ret; \
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev; \
>> + (vdev) = (&(hw)->dev); \
>> + (((vdev)->is_vfio) ? \
>> + (ioport_inw(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, &ret)) : \
>> + ((ret) = (inw((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))))); \
>> + ret; \
>> +})
>> +
>> +#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_2(hw, reg, value) \
>> +({ \
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev; \
>> + (vdev) = (&(hw)->dev); \
>> + (((vdev)->is_vfio) ? \
>> + (ioport_outw_p(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, (uint16_t)(value))) : \
>> + (outw_p((unsigned short)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg)))))); \
>> +})
>> +
>> +#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_4(hw, reg) \
>> +({ \
>> + uint32_t ret; \
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev; \
>> + (vdev) = (&(hw)->dev); \
>> + (((vdev)->is_vfio) ? \
>> + (ioport_inl(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, &ret)) : \
>> + ((ret) = (inl((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))))); \
>> + ret; \
>> +})
>> +
>> +#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_4(hw, reg, value) \
>> +({ \
>> + struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev; \
>> + (vdev) = (&(hw)->dev); \
>> + (((vdev)->is_vfio) ? \
>> + (ioport_outl_p(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, (uint32_t)(value))) : \
>> + (outl_p((unsigned int)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg)))))); \
>> +})
>>
>> static inline int
>> vtpci_with_feature(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint32_t bit)
>
More information about the dev
mailing list