[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] ena: fix for icc compiler

[Jan Mędala]

Uhm, wait, I think that sha is wrong, please let me check it double time.

  Jan

2016-07-05 19:03 GMT+02:00 Jan Mędala <jan at semihalf.com>:

> Bruce,
>
>
> That'd be very kind of you if you can fix trailing zeros.
>
>
> This patch
>
> Fixes: b5b8cd9 ("ena: update of ENA communication layer")
>
>
> Regards,
>
>   Jan
>
> 2016-07-05 18:19 GMT+02:00 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:52:09AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> > On 6/30/2016 4:04 PM, Jan Medala wrote:
>> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Matushevsky <matua at amazon.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Palider <jpa at semihalf.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Medala <jan at semihalf.com>
>> >
>> > The compilation error to fix is [1], it may be good to add what to fix
>> > into commit log.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > == Build drivers/net/ena
>> >   CC ena_ethdev.o
>> > /tmp/dpdk_maintain/ena_v3/dpdk/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c(943): error
>> > #188: enumerated type mixed with another type
>> >         struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx = { 0 };
>> >                                              ^
>> >
>> > /tmp/dpdk_maintain/ena_v3/dpdk/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c(1036): error
>> > #188: enumerated type mixed with another type
>> >         struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx = { 0 };
>> >                                              ^
>> > ...
>> >
>> > > --- a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
>> > > @@ -940,7 +940,10 @@ static int ena_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
>> *dev,
>> > >                           __rte_unused unsigned int socket_id,
>> > >                           __rte_unused const struct rte_eth_txconf
>> *tx_conf)
>> > >  {
>> > > -   struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx = { 0 };
>> > > +   struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx =
>> > > +           /* policy set to _HOST just to satisfy icc compiler */
>> > > +           { ENA_ADMIN_PLACEMENT_POLICY_HOST,
>> > > +             ENA_COM_IO_QUEUE_DIRECTION_TX, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>> >
>> > Trailing "0" are not required, compiler will take care of them.
>> >
>> Jan,
>>
>> any comment on this? If you want, I can remove the trailing zeros on apply
>> rather than needing a V3. Is that ok?
>>
>> Again a fixes line is missing, can you supply one.
>>
>> /Bruce
>>
>
>