[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mempool: fix lack of free() registration

Olivier Matz olivier.matz at 6wind.com
Tue Jul 19 17:26:53 CEST 2016


Hi Zoltan,

I ran ./scripts/check-git-log.sh on your patch, showing some minor
styling issues:

On 07/19/2016 04:37 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> [PATCH] mempool: fix lack of free() registration

"()" should be removed

> The new mempool handler interface forgets to register the free() function
> of the ops. Introduced in this patch:
> 
> 449c49b9 mempool: support handler operations

The format should be:
Fixes: 449c49b93a6b ("mempool: support handler operations")


> 
> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss at schaman.hu>
> ---
>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_ops.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_ops.c b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_ops.c
> index fd0b64c..5f24de2 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_ops.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_ops.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ rte_mempool_register_ops(const struct rte_mempool_ops *h)
>  	ops = &rte_mempool_ops_table.ops[ops_index];
>  	snprintf(ops->name, sizeof(ops->name), "%s", h->name);
>  	ops->alloc = h->alloc;
> +	ops->free = h->free;
>  	ops->enqueue = h->enqueue;
>  	ops->dequeue = h->dequeue;
>  	ops->get_count = h->get_count;
> 

Apart from that:
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>

+CC Thomas, I think it should be included in 16.07.

Thanks!


More information about the dev mailing list