[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 22/29] ixgbe/base: add bypassing VLVF

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Mon Jun 13 16:46:08 CEST 2016


On 5/6/2016 7:07 AM, Beilei Xing wrote:
> This patch adds support for the VLVF to be bypassed when adding or
> removing a VFTA entry.  The PF can utilize the default pool while
> preserving the VLVF for the VFs use.
> Meanwhile, update corresponding VF ops and drivers where corresponding
> ops is invoked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_82598.c  |  5 ++-
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_82598.h  |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_api.c    | 11 ++++--
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_api.h    |  5 ++-
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.h |  7 ++--
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_type.h   |  5 ++-
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_vf.c     |  6 ++-
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_vf.h     |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c      | 11 ++++--
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c          |  2 +-
>  11 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Beilei,

This patch failing to apply to latest dpdk-next-net/rel_16_07

Applying: ixgbe/base: add bypassing VLVF
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M       drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
M       drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_pf.c
Auto-merging drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
Failed to merge in the changes.
Patch failed at 0001 ixgbe/base: add bypassing VLVF




More information about the dev mailing list