[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] prepare for rte_device / rte_driver

Jan Viktorin viktorin at rehivetech.com
Thu Jun 16 12:48:59 CEST 2016


On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:42:29 +0000
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 1:04 PM
> > To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com>
> > Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com>; viktorin at rehivetech.com;
> > dev at dpdk.org; Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] prepare for rte_device / rte_driver
> > 
> > 2016-06-16 06:32, Shreyansh Jain:  
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger, Bernard  
> > > > Patches 3,8,16 and 17 no longer apply to the latest master branch.
> > > > A rebase is needed.  
> > >
> > > With the recent most head (04920e6): 01, 03, 08, 15, 16 and 17 are failing.
> > >
> > > Just wanted to check if there is a rebase of this series anytime soon?  
> > 
> > I will take care of this series if time permit.  
> 
> Ok.
> By the way, I have already rebased it on master. I can post the patches here if you want.
> (only trivial conflicts were there)

Sounds good. +1

I'd rebase my patchset on top of it and repost.

> 
> > It would help to have more reviews on other series touching EAL, like
> > pmdinfo.  
> 
> Ok. I can try and review this, non-PCI/SoC and similar patchset in next few days.

The original David's patchset was quite OK. I didn't have any comments. The thing
is (from my POV) that it was incomplete.

Jan

> 
> >   
> > > I was looking at Jan's non-PCI patchset [1] and they are based on this  
> > series.  
> > >
> > > [1]  
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/30913/focus=38486  
> 
> -
> Shreyansh
> 


More information about the dev mailing list